Top 2 Alternatives to Automation Anywhere for RPA and Desktop UI
Introduction and Context
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) gained momentum in the early 2000s as organizations looked for reliable ways to automate repetitive, rules-based tasks across legacy and modern applications. Automation Anywhere emerged as one of the early leaders in this space, helping enterprises scale from ad hoc screen-scraping to robust, orchestrated “digital workforce” programs. Over time, the platform broadened from simple desktop recording to enterprise-grade features like centralized bot management, analytics, and governance.
Automation Anywhere’s popularity grew for several reasons:
It simplified automation with a visual designer and recorders, lowering the barrier for business users and testers.
It offered a comprehensive suite, including Control Room for orchestration, Bot Creator and Bot Runner for development and execution, and document automation and analytics features to support end-to-end workflows.
It integrated with CI/CD and IT ecosystems, enabling teams to treat bots similarly to software artifacts.
It straddled both RPA and test automation use cases, allowing quality teams to reuse workflows for regression testing and production automations.
Typically deployed on Windows, Automation Anywhere combines low-code visual flows with enterprise-grade management. It’s widely adopted across finance, healthcare, telecom, and other regulated industries due to its governance and security posture.
Yet, even with strong adoption and ongoing innovation, teams sometimes look beyond Automation Anywhere. Reasons vary: expanding platform coverage, differing design philosophies, budget and licensing considerations, or preferences for specific developer experiences. If you’re evaluating your stack for the next wave of automation, it’s worth understanding what leading alternatives offer and where they might fit better.
Overview: Top Alternatives Covered
Here are the top 2 alternatives to Automation Anywhere for RPA/Desktop UI:
Blue Prism
RPA Tools (UiPath)
Why Look for Automation Anywhere Alternatives?
Organizations consider alternatives for a mix of technical and operational reasons. Common drivers include:
Platform constraints and ecosystem fit
Total cost of ownership (TCO)
Setup, maintenance, and operational complexity
Flakiness due to fragile UI selectors
DevOps and collaboration workflows
Skills availability and training
Alternative 1: Blue Prism
What It Is
Description: Blue Prism is an RPA/desktop UI tool designed for Windows. It’s widely used to automate repeatable, rules-based UI workflows and can be harnessed for regression-style test activities where appropriate.
Platforms: Windows
License: Commercial
Primary Tech: Visual
Best For: Teams automating end-to-end flows across browsers and platforms, especially where enterprise governance, security, and consistency matter.
Blue Prism was developed by Blue Prism Group (a UK-based company) and helped define the “digital workforce” concept. It emphasizes a structured approach to automation, where reusable objects (representing applications and UI elements) are composed into processes, with a strong focus on security, auditing, and governance.
Core Strengths
Enterprise-grade governance and security
Reusable object-oriented design
Robust orchestration and queueing
Modern workflow support and CI/CD integration
Stable execution at scale
How It Compares to Automation Anywhere
Design philosophy
Developer and business user balance
CI/CD and enterprise integration
Platform scope
Test automation overlap
Potential Drawbacks
Setup and maintenance effort
Flakiness if patterns aren’t followed
Windows-centric
When Blue Prism Shines
You want predictable governance and a structured design mandate from day one.
Your environment is primarily Windows and your organization values auditable, scalable RPA programs.
You prefer object reuse and strict separation of concerns to keep large automation portfolios maintainable.
Alternative 2: RPA Tools (UiPath)
What It Is
Description: RPA Tools (UiPath) is an RPA/desktop UI tool designed for Windows/macOS. It’s primarily an RPA platform, but many teams leverage it for regression UI automation and orchestrated end-to-end flows.
Platforms: Windows/macOS
License: Commercial
Primary Tech: Visual + .NET
Best For: Teams automating end-to-end flows across browsers and platforms, especially those who want deep .NET extensibility and modern DevOps integrations.
UiPath was founded with a strong engineering focus and grew rapidly through an expansive activity library, a developer-friendly Studio, and a robust orchestrator. It has become a go-to choice for teams that value both a visual builder and the ability to drop into .NET for custom logic and integrations.
Core Strengths
Visual development plus .NET extensibility
Broad activity ecosystem and integrations
Strong CI/CD and version control practices
Modern workflow patterns and testing overlap
Growing AI and document processing capabilities
How It Compares to Automation Anywhere
Developer experience
Platform flexibility
Orchestration and ecosystem
Test automation overlap
Potential Drawbacks
Setup and maintenance
Flakiness if poorly structured
Commercial licensing
When UiPath Shines
You need tight alignment with .NET and developer-centric workflows.
Your team wants a visual tool that remains friendly to complex customizations and integrations.
You value strong version control practices and robust CI/CD patterns for automation projects.
Things to Consider Before Choosing an Automation Anywhere Alternative
Before committing to a platform change or a hybrid approach, evaluate the following:
Project scope and complexity
Platform and environment requirements
Language and extensibility
Ease of setup and ongoing operations
Execution speed and reliability
CI/CD and DevOps integration
Debugging and observability
Community, documentation, and support
Scalability and governance
Cost and licensing model
Advanced capabilities
Test automation crossover
Conclusion
Automation Anywhere remains a leading, enterprise-grade RPA platform that has earned its place in large-scale automation programs. Its visual builder, Control Room, and strong governance features make it a solid choice for Windows-centric environments, and it can effectively overlap with test automation needs when teams apply sound engineering practices.
Still, alternatives can be a better fit depending on your organization’s priorities:
Choose Blue Prism if you want a highly structured, object-oriented approach with strong governance from day one. It excels in regulated, large-scale settings where predictable patterns and auditability are top priorities.
Choose RPA Tools (UiPath) if your teams value .NET extensibility, a large activity ecosystem, and developer-centric CI/CD workflows. It’s well-suited for mixed teams of engineers and citizen developers working together on complex, end-to-end automations.
In many enterprises, the “best” tool is the one that aligns with team skills, infrastructure realities, and long-term governance. If you’re expanding an automation program or modernizing your QA strategy, run a structured proof of concept against a few real processes. Measure setup time, selector resilience, debug velocity, pipeline integration, and operational overhead. With a disciplined evaluation, you’ll identify the platform—Automation Anywhere or an alternative—that balances speed, stability, and scale for your RPA and desktop UI automation roadmap.
Sep 24, 2025