Top 39 Alternatives to Burp Suite (Enterprise) for Java Testing

Introduction

Burp Suite, created by PortSwigger, has been a cornerstone of dynamic application security testing (DAST) for web applications and APIs for over a decade. It originally gained popularity as a hands-on toolkit (with tools such as Proxy, Repeater, Intruder, and Scanner) that security engineers and developers could use to manually and semi-automatically find vulnerabilities in web applications. Over time, its Enterprise edition introduced automated scanning at scale, CI/CD pipeline integration, scheduling, and centralized reporting—making it suitable for organizations aiming to continuously assess security posture across large application portfolios.

Why did it become widely used? Burp Suite (Enterprise) focuses on DAST—testing running applications in realistic conditions—so it can uncover issues that static analysis or unit tests might miss. It is broadly adopted in security and QA teams because it is:

• Well-established in its niche with strong security testing features.

• Effective for automated web/API security scans in enterprise environments.

• Backed by a mature ecosystem and frequent updates.

However, teams increasingly seek alternatives or complementary tools. Reasons include the need to test beyond web security (e.g., performance, functional UI, mobile, and accessibility); the desire for open-source or lower-cost options; and the need to better fit modern Java-heavy stacks, developer workflows, and CI-first cultures.

This guide covers 39 alternatives that Java-focused teams consider when assessing or complementing Burp Suite (Enterprise).

Overview: Top 39 Alternatives

Here are the top 39 alternatives for Burp Suite (Enterprise):

• Applitools Eyes

• Citrus

• Cypress

• Detox

• Espresso

• FitNesse

• Gauge

• IBM Rational Functional Tester

• JMeter

• JUnit

• Jest

• Katalon Platform (Studio)

• Mabl

• Mocha

• NeoLoad

• Nightwatch.js

• OWASP ZAP

• PIT (Pitest)

• Playwright

• Postman + Newman

• Protractor (deprecated)

• ReadyAPI

• Repeato

• Rest Assured

• Sahi Pro

• Selenide

• Serenity BDD

• SikuliX

• SoapUI (Open Source)

• TestCafe

• TestCafe Studio

• TestComplete

• TestNG

• UI Automator

• Vitest

• Waldo

• WebdriverIO

• axe-core / axe DevTools

• k6

Why Look for Burp Suite (Enterprise) Alternatives?

• Scope is focused on DAST: Great for web/API security, but it does not cover functional UI, unit, performance, mobile, or accessibility testing. Teams often need a broader testing stack.

• Cost and licensing: Commercial licensing can be expensive for small teams or organizations with many services, making open-source or low-cost tools attractive.

• Tuning and false positives: DAST scans may require tuning to reduce noise and align with app-specific behaviors, adding maintenance overhead.

• Integration complexity: Enterprise setup, scaling, and integration with custom CI/CD workflows can demand additional time and engineering effort.

• Niche applicability: Security scanning may still require integration with other tools for end-to-end quality (e.g., performance, reliability, visual, and accessibility testing).

Detailed Breakdown of Alternatives

Applitools Eyes

A visual testing platform for web, mobile, and desktop that uses AI-powered visual diffs and the Ultrafast Grid to run visual checks at scale.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Focuses on visual correctness rather than security vulnerabilities. Complements DAST by catching UI regressions that security scanners won’t detect.

• Best for: Front-end and QA teams validating look-and-feel across versions.

Citrus

A Java-based integration testing framework for message-driven systems (HTTP, WebSocket, JMS), emphasizing message flows and validation.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Targets integration and messaging validation, not DAST. Useful for Java-centric API/integration testing where protocol flows matter.

• Best for: Teams automating complex integration tests.

Cypress

A popular JavaScript end-to-end testing framework for modern web apps with a developer-friendly experience and time-travel debugging.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional correctness vs. security. Ideal for Java web apps with JS front-ends that need reliable e2e test coverage.

• Best for: Teams automating end-to-end web flows.

Detox

A gray-box mobile testing framework focused on React Native, running tests on devices and synchronizing with app state.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Mobile UI automation rather than DAST. Complements security by improving mobile app reliability.

• Best for: Teams testing React Native apps on Android and iOS.

Espresso

Google’s official Android UI test framework for reliable, fast, and maintainable mobile UI tests.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Focused on Android UI quality, not web/API security. Suits teams with Android-first products.

• Best for: Android mobile app testing.

FitNesse

A wiki-based acceptance testing and ATDD tool where teams write executable specifications backed by fixtures.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Acceptance-level validation, not DAST. Useful for executable specifications in Java stacks.

• Best for: Cross-functional teams practicing acceptance testing/BDD.

Gauge

An open-source specification-based testing tool from ThoughtWorks that supports readable specs for web automation.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional e2e testing vs. security scanning. Good for teams wanting BDD-like specs in automation.

• Best for: Spec-driven e2e testing on the web.

IBM Rational Functional Tester

An enterprise-grade UI automation tool for desktop and web, suited to legacy and large-scale environments.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional enterprise UI testing rather than DAST. Often used in regulated, legacy-rich environments.

• Best for: Large enterprises with desktop/web automation needs.

JMeter

An Apache open-source tool for load, stress, and performance testing of web, APIs, and various protocols.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Performance-focused rather than security. Complements DAST by revealing performance bottlenecks.

• Best for: Performance engineers and DevOps teams.

JUnit

The foundational unit/integration test framework for JVM projects; ubiquitous in CI pipelines.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Code-level validation vs. DAST. Core to Java quality practices, not a security scanner.

• Best for: Java developers writing unit and integration tests.

Jest

A fast, developer-friendly JavaScript test runner for unit, component, and light e2e testing with snapshots and parallelism.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Front-end testing rather than security scanning. Helps keep JS-heavy UIs stable.

• Best for: Node.js and web application testing.

Katalon Platform (Studio)

A low-code, all-in-one platform for web, mobile, API, and desktop testing with recorders and analytics.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional testing breadth vs. DAST depth. Useful for teams standardizing on one platform.

• Best for: Teams wanting a consolidated test platform.

Mabl

A SaaS-first, low-code/AI e2e testing platform for web and API with self-healing capabilities.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional e2e testing vs. security scanning. Great for accelerating regression coverage.

• Best for: Web/API teams seeking low-code automation.

Mocha

A flexible JavaScript test runner for Node.js used for unit and integration testing.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Developer-centric testing vs. DAST. Useful for Node services powering Java front-ends.

• Best for: Teams needing a simple JS test runner.

NeoLoad

An enterprise performance testing platform for web, APIs, and protocols, built for scale and deep integrations.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Performance and scalability, not security. Ideal for high-traffic systems.

• Best for: Enterprises running complex load/performance tests.

Nightwatch.js

A JavaScript e2e framework leveraging Selenium/WebDriver and modern automation tooling.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional e2e vs. DAST. Suits teams standardizing on Selenium/WebDriver.

• Best for: Web e2e testing with WebDriver.

OWASP ZAP

An open-source DAST tool for web and APIs, with automation hooks and active community support.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: The closest open-source DAST alternative. Offers automated scans; may require more tuning for parity with commercial features.

• Best for: Teams needing cost-effective DAST.

PIT (Pitest)

A mutation testing tool for the JVM that mutates bytecode to assess test suite effectiveness.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Evaluates unit/integration test rigor, not security. Improves confidence in Java tests.

• Best for: QA engineers raising test suite quality.

Playwright

A modern e2e framework for Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit with auto-waiting and a powerful trace viewer.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional correctness for web UIs, not DAST. Excellent for modern front-ends of Java apps.

• Best for: Teams automating cross-browser e2e tests.

Postman + Newman

API testing via collections and a CLI runner that integrates into CI pipelines.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional API validation vs. security scanning. Essential for API-first Java services.

• Best for: Backend developers and QA validating APIs.

Protractor (deprecated)

Formerly the Angular e2e framework; now deprecated and not recommended for new projects.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional e2e (now legacy) vs. DAST. Consider modern replacements like Playwright.

• Best for: Maintaining legacy projects only.

ReadyAPI

A commercial API testing suite for SOAP/REST/GraphQL with advanced features and reporting.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: API quality and functionality vs. security scanning. Strong commercial option for API validation.

• Best for: Enterprises standardizing API testing.

Repeato

A codeless, computer-vision-based testing tool for iOS and Android that is resilient to UI changes.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Mobile UI automation, not DAST. Useful for visual and interaction stability on mobile.

• Best for: Mobile teams seeking codeless automation.

Rest Assured

A fluent Java DSL for REST API testing that integrates seamlessly with Java build tools and CI.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional API testing vs. security scanning. A natural fit for Java developers.

• Best for: Java teams testing APIs.

Sahi Pro

An enterprise-focused e2e automation tool for web and desktop with robust recording and execution.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional automation vs. DAST. Good for complex enterprise UIs.

• Best for: Enterprises needing resilient e2e automation.

Selenide

A concise Java wrapper over Selenium WebDriver with built-in waits and stable APIs.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional UI testing in Java vs. security scanning. Great for Java-first UI automation.

• Best for: Java teams automating web UIs.

Serenity BDD

A BDD-aligned test framework with advanced reporting and the Screenplay pattern for maintainable e2e tests.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Behavioral and functional testing vs. DAST. Elevates reporting and test design.

• Best for: Teams adopting BDD with strong reporting.

SikuliX

A computer vision-based desktop automation tool using screenshots to drive UI interactions across platforms.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Desktop/UI focus, not security scanning. Useful for non-web GUIs.

• Best for: Desktop automation and legacy systems.

SoapUI (Open Source)

The classic open-source GUI tool for SOAP and REST API testing with scripting and community support.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional API testing vs. security scanning. Solid free option for API validation.

• Best for: QA and developers testing APIs on a budget.

TestCafe

A JavaScript/TypeScript e2e framework running without WebDriver and offering isolated browser contexts.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional web e2e vs. DAST. Simpler setup for many teams.

• Best for: Web teams wanting quick, reliable e2e tests.

TestCafe Studio

A commercial, codeless IDE built on TestCafe for creating and running web tests visually.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional UI testing vs. security scanning. Eases authoring for non-coders.

• Best for: Teams preferring a codeless e2e IDE.

TestComplete

A codeless/scripted test platform (desktop, web, mobile) with recorder, scripting, and broad tech support.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional automation across platforms vs. DAST. Good for broad coverage in one tool.

• Best for: Enterprises standardizing on a single test suite.

TestNG

A flexible JVM testing framework with advanced annotations, parallelization, and data-driven capabilities.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Code-level test orchestration vs. DAST. Core for Java automation frameworks.

• Best for: Java teams needing robust test orchestration.

UI Automator

An Android framework for system-level UI automation that can operate across apps and system UI.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Android system UI automation vs. web/API security scanning. Essential for device-level scenarios.

• Best for: Android teams testing beyond a single app.

Vitest

A Vite-native test runner for fast unit/component testing in modern web stacks.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Front-end unit/component tests vs. DAST. Fits modern JS tooling.

• Best for: Teams on Vite-based front-ends.

Waldo

A no-code mobile UI testing platform with cloud-based execution and CI integrations.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Mobile UI automation vs. DAST. Reduces code effort for mobile test coverage.

• Best for: Mobile teams seeking quick coverage.

WebdriverIO

A modern JavaScript/TypeScript automation framework over WebDriver and DevTools, supporting web and mobile via Appium.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Functional automation vs. DAST. Unifies web and mobile automation for JS teams.

• Best for: Teams standardizing on JS for e2e.

axe-core / axe DevTools

Deque’s accessibility engine and tooling for automated WCAG checks with integrations into dev and test workflows.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Accessibility compliance vs. security scanning. Complements overall quality and legal compliance needs.

• Best for: Teams embedding accessibility into QA.

k6

A developer-friendly load testing tool with JavaScript scripting and optional managed cloud service.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Burp: Performance/load testing vs. DAST. Helps ensure reliability under real-world traffic.

• Best for: DevOps and performance engineering teams.

Things to Consider Before Choosing a Burp Alternative

• Project scope and risk coverage: Do you need DAST, functional UI, API, mobile, performance, accessibility, or a combination?

• Language and stack fit: Ensure Java/JVM support where needed (e.g., JUnit, TestNG, Selenide, Rest Assured) and alignment with your front-end or mobile stack.

• Ease of setup and maintenance: Consider onboarding, test authoring speed, configuration complexity, and ongoing tuning.

• Execution speed and reliability: Auto-waiting, flake reduction, and parallelization can significantly impact feedback cycles.

• CI/CD integration: Look for native CLIs, containerized execution, and pipeline plugins for your CI system.

• Debugging and reporting: Trace viewers, rich reports, and dashboards help teams diagnose failures fast and communicate status.

• Community and ecosystem: Open-source health, plugin ecosystems, and vendor support are crucial for long-term success.

• Scalability and cost: Balance licensing, infrastructure requirements, and the ability to scale tests and scans across services.

• Security vs. quality coverage: If replacing DAST entirely, validate whether the new stack addresses security requirements or if you need multiple tools.

Conclusion

Burp Suite (Enterprise) remains a widely used, mature platform for automated DAST across web and API surfaces—especially valuable for organizations prioritizing continuous security scanning. Yet modern teams often need broader testing coverage: functional UI, API correctness, performance, visual validation, mobile reliability, and accessibility. That is why alternatives such as OWASP ZAP (for open-source DAST), Rest Assured and Postman (for API functionality), Playwright and Selenide (for web e2e in Java-centric stacks), JMeter and k6 (for performance), Applitools Eyes (for visual diffs), and axe DevTools (for accessibility) are so compelling.

If your primary goal is security scanning alone, OWASP ZAP is the closest alternative. If you need to complement DAST with other quality dimensions, mix and match tools aligned to your stack:

• Java-heavy web UI: Selenide, Serenity BDD, Playwright (Java bindings).

• API-first services: Rest Assured, ReadyAPI, Postman + Newman.

• Performance at scale: JMeter, NeoLoad, k6.

• Mobile coverage: Espresso, UI Automator, Detox, Waldo, Repeato.

• Visual and accessibility: Applitools Eyes, axe-core / axe DevTools.

Choosing the right combination—guided by your scope, skill sets, and budget—will deliver comprehensive coverage that better fits modern Java development and QA workflows while keeping your applications both secure and high quality.