Top 40 Commercial Alternatives to Mabl

Introduction

The last decade of test automation saw a shift from hand-coded Selenium scripts toward SaaS-first, low-code, and AI-assisted tools. Mabl emerged in this wave as a low-code, AI-driven end-to-end (E2E) testing platform focused on web and API testing. It popularized self-healing selectors, cloud-managed execution, rich reporting, and tight CI/CD integrations—making UI and API regression testing faster to author and easier to maintain.

Mabl became popular because it blends a visual recorder with code-optional extensibility, provides parallel cloud runs, captures network and visual changes, and integrates into modern delivery workflows. Teams adopted it to reduce script brittleness, onboard non-SDET contributors, and consolidate test authoring, execution, and analytics in one SaaS platform.

However, as teams expand into native mobile, require massive device coverage, need deep visual validation, or want more control over the execution stack, they often look for alternatives. The market now offers a wide spectrum—from visual AI and real-device clouds to model-based automation, performance engineering, synthetics, and RPA—all of which can complement or replace parts of what Mabl does.

Overview: The Top 40 Alternatives to Mabl

Here are the top 40 commercial alternatives to Mabl covered in this guide:

• Applitools Eyes

• Applitools for Mobile

• Automation Anywhere

• BitBar

• BlazeMeter

• Blue Prism

• BrowserStack Automate

• Burp Suite (Enterprise)

• Checkly

• Cypress Cloud

• Datadog Synthetic Tests

• Eggplant Test

• Functionize

• Happo

• IBM Rational Functional Tester

• Kobiton

• LambdaTest

• LoadRunner

• Micro Focus Silk Test

• Microsoft Playwright Testing

• NeoLoad

• New Relic Synthetics

• Percy

• Perfecto

• Pingdom

• RPA Tools (UiPath)

• Ranorex

• ReadyAPI

• Repeato

• Sahi Pro

• Sauce Labs

• Squish

• TestCafe Studio

• TestComplete

• Testim

• Tricentis Tosca

• UFT One (formerly QTP)

• Virtuoso

• Waldo

• testRigor

Why Look for Mabl Alternatives?

• Broader platform coverage: You may need first-class native mobile support, embedded/desktop UI automation, or massive device/browser matrices beyond what Mabl targets.

• Code-first control: Teams that prefer Playwright/Cypress/Selenium may want full code control, local debugging, and vendor-agnostic skills without low-code constraints.

• Specialized capabilities: Deep visual AI, performance/load testing, DAST security scanning, or component-level visual regression may be better served by specialized tools.

• Cost and scale: High-volume parallelization, very large teams, or complex test matrices can drive cost and performance considerations toward other platforms.

• Private/hybrid execution: Some organizations require on-prem, VPC, or hybrid execution models that are easier with other vendors or self-hostable runners.

• Avoiding lock-in: Minimizing proprietary models and ensuring portability to open-source stacks is important for some teams’ long-term strategies.

Detailed Breakdown of Alternatives

Applitools Eyes

• What it is: Visual AI testing for web, mobile, and desktop; known for its Ultrafast Grid and AI-powered visual diffs.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Mabl includes visual checks, but Applitools specializes in visual AI at scale; many teams pair code-based E2E with Eyes for robust UI change detection.

Applitools for Mobile

• What it is: Visual testing for iOS and Android; part of the Applitools ecosystem.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: If native mobile visual accuracy is paramount, Applitools often provides more nuanced baselines and analysis.

Automation Anywhere

• What it is: An RPA platform for Windows that overlaps with UI automation use cases.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Better suited for desktop and back-office process automation; Mabl is stronger for web and API test authoring.

BitBar

• What it is: A SmartBear real-device and browser cloud for mobile and web.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: BitBar provides the device/browser grid you can use with any framework; Mabl is an all-in-one authoring and execution platform.

BlazeMeter

• What it is: A SaaS performance and load testing platform compatible with JMeter, Gatling, and k6.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Focused on performance testing rather than functional UI automation; complements Mabl for end-to-end performance validation.

Blue Prism

• What it is: An RPA suite for Windows UI and process automation.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Stronger for RPA/desktop; Mabl is better for web and API test authoring and reporting.

BrowserStack Automate

• What it is: A large real device/browser cloud for web and mobile automation.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Provides the infrastructure for code-first frameworks, whereas Mabl provides a low-code authoring platform with built-in execution.

Burp Suite (Enterprise)

• What it is: DAST security scanning for web and APIs with automated scheduling and reporting.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Focuses on security testing rather than functional E2E; complements functional test suites.

Checkly

• What it is: Synthetics and E2E checks as code; Playwright-based browser checks plus API monitoring.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: More code-centric synthetics; Mabl offers low-code authoring with AI-assisted maintenance.

Cypress Cloud

• What it is: A SaaS runner and insights layer for Cypress tests.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: For teams standardized on Cypress, Cypress Cloud adds scale and insights; Mabl targets low-code test creation and maintenance.

Datadog Synthetic Tests

• What it is: Browser and API synthetics within the Datadog observability platform.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Stronger in production monitoring and unified observability; Mabl excels at structured test authoring and broader functional coverage.

Eggplant Test

• What it is: Model-based test automation with image recognition for desktop, web, and mobile.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: More flexible for non-DOM UIs and legacy systems; Mabl is streamlined for modern web and API testing.

Functionize

• What it is: AI-assisted E2E testing for web and mobile with ML-based selectors.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Similar low-code plus AI positioning; selection may come down to UI authoring preferences, locator stability, and pricing.

Happo

• What it is: Component-level visual regression testing for web UIs.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Happo focuses on component visual diffs, while Mabl focuses on E2E flows. Many teams use both.

IBM Rational Functional Tester

• What it is: Enterprise functional UI automation for desktop and web.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Strong for legacy enterprise stacks; Mabl is more modern SaaS-first for web/API.

Kobiton

• What it is: A mobile device cloud for manual and automated testing.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Kobiton addresses native mobile device coverage; Mabl primarily targets web and API.

LambdaTest

• What it is: Cloud-based cross-browser testing for web and mobile.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Infrastructure and orchestration for code-first testing vs. Mabl’s low-code test authoring.

LoadRunner

• What it is: Enterprise load/performance testing for web, APIs, and protocols.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Specialized for performance engineering; complements functional E2E tests.

Micro Focus Silk Test

• What it is: Legacy enterprise UI automation for desktop and web.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Better for legacy desktop estates; Mabl is streamlined for modern web apps.

Microsoft Playwright Testing

• What it is: Managed cloud service to run Playwright tests at scale.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Code-first with Playwright vs. Mabl’s low-code recorder and self-healing.

NeoLoad

• What it is: Enterprise performance/load testing for web, APIs, and protocols.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Focused on load/performance; augment Mabl’s functional suites with NeoLoad for performance SLAs.

New Relic Synthetics

• What it is: Scripted browser and API checks within the New Relic observability platform.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Better for production reliability checks; Mabl is better for design-time functional coverage and regression suites.

Percy

• What it is: Visual snapshot testing for the web with CI integration.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Percy excels at visual regression, while Mabl focuses on functional flow testing with visual checks as an add-on.

Perfecto

• What it is: An enterprise device cloud for mobile and web testing.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Perfecto provides the device/browser lab; Mabl provides low-code authoring with built-in cloud execution.

Pingdom

• What it is: Uptime and transactional synthetics for web and APIs.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Geared for uptime and simple transactions in production; Mabl is for comprehensive functional regression.

RPA Tools (UiPath)

• What it is: RPA platform for Windows and macOS with capabilities overlapping UI test automation.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Better for automation of business processes and desktop apps; Mabl is better for web/API test lifecycle.

Ranorex

• What it is: Codeless and scripted E2E tool for desktop, web, and mobile.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Broader desktop coverage; Mabl offers low-code web/API focus with self-healing.

ReadyAPI

• What it is: Advanced API testing for SOAP/REST/GraphQL.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: ReadyAPI is deeper on APIs, contracts, and virtualization; Mabl combines API checks with E2E web flows.

Repeato

• What it is: Codeless, computer-vision-based mobile UI testing for iOS and Android.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Purpose-built for native mobile UI with CV; Mabl is primarily web and API.

Sahi Pro

• What it is: E2E UI testing for web and desktop; well-suited for enterprise web apps.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: More code-leaning with strong enterprise web support; Mabl emphasizes low-code plus AI.

Sauce Labs

• What it is: Cloud grid for web and mobile automation with analytics.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Infrastructure and analytics for code-first tests vs. Mabl’s all-in-one authoring and execution.

Squish

• What it is: GUI E2E tool for Qt/QML, embedded, desktop, and web UIs.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Ideal for Qt/embedded/desktop ecosystems; Mabl is focused on browser-based applications and APIs.

TestCafe Studio

• What it is: A codeless IDE variant of TestCafe for web testing.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Similar codeless web focus, but centered on the TestCafe engine; Mabl adds AI self-healing and SaaS-first orchestration.

TestComplete

• What it is: Codeless/scripted E2E tool for desktop, web, and mobile.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Wider desktop coverage with strong recorder; Mabl excels in SaaS simplicity and AI-assisted maintenance for web/API.

Testim

• What it is: AI-assisted E2E testing for web with self-healing locators.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Very similar low-code plus AI approach; differences lie in authoring UX, locator strategies, and pricing models.

Tricentis Tosca

• What it is: Model-based test automation for web, mobile, desktop, and SAP.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Better for enterprise app ecosystems (e.g., SAP) with model-based methodology; Mabl is simpler for web/API teams.

UFT One (formerly QTP)

• What it is: Enterprise functional UI automation for desktop and web.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Stronger for legacy/desktop; Mabl provides a modern, SaaS-first path for web and API testing.

Virtuoso

• What it is: AI-assisted E2E testing for web and mobile with NLP-driven authoring.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Similar low-code/AI promise, but emphasizes NLP authoring; selection depends on team preference for authoring style.

Waldo

• What it is: No-code mobile UI testing for iOS and Android with cloud runs.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Purpose-built for native mobile; Mabl is focused on web and API.

testRigor

• What it is: Natural-language E2E testing for web and mobile.

• Strengths:

• Compared to Mabl: Similar low-code vision; testRigor leans heavily on natural language, while Mabl blends recorder and AI-assisted maintenance.

ReadyAPI (repeated above? No, this is already covered; ensure no duplicates)

[Already covered above as ReadyAPI.]

Perfecto (already covered above)

[Already covered above as Perfecto.]

Things to Consider Before Choosing a Mabl Alternative

• Application scope and platforms:

• Authoring model and skills:

• Execution infrastructure:

• Debugging and triage:

• Stability and AI capabilities:

• CI/CD and ecosystem integrations:

• Reporting and analytics:

• Security and compliance:

• Performance and security testing needs:

• Scalability and cost:

• Vendor lock-in and portability:

Conclusion

Mabl remains a strong choice for teams that want a low-code, AI-assisted, SaaS-first solution for web and API testing with self-healing and CI/CD integrations. Its appeal lies in fast authoring, built-in parallel cloud runs, and consolidated reporting.

That said, different teams and applications have different needs. If you prioritize:

• Visual fidelity across hundreds of browser/device combinations, tools like Applitools Eyes or Percy stand out.

• Massive device/browser coverage and code-first control, a device cloud like BrowserStack Automate, Sauce Labs, LambdaTest, Perfecto, or BitBar may fit better.

• Native mobile UI testing without deep coding, consider Waldo, Repeato, Kobiton, or Applitools for Mobile.

• Performance and reliability in production, tools like BlazeMeter, LoadRunner, NeoLoad, Datadog Synthetic Tests, New Relic Synthetics, and Pingdom complement your functional tests.

• Desktop, SAP, or legacy environments, platforms like UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, Ranorex, Squish, and Silk Test typically offer stronger coverage.

• NLP/model-based and AI-assisted workflows similar to Mabl, evaluate Functionize, Virtuoso, testRigor, Testim, and Checkly.

In practice, many organizations use a combination: a code-first framework with a device/browser cloud, plus a visual AI layer and synthetics in production. Start by mapping your app landscape, team skills, and compliance needs, then pilot two or three options from this list to validate stability, speed, and total cost at your target scale.