Top 40 Commercial Alternatives to Sauce Labs

Introduction and context

Sauce Labs emerged as part of the broader web and mobile test automation movement catalyzed by frameworks like Selenium (for browsers) and Appium (for mobile). As teams struggled to maintain their own device labs and browser matrices, cloud-based grids became essential. Sauce Labs made cross-browser and cross-device testing accessible by offering a managed cloud of real devices and emulators/simulators, parallel execution, secure tunnels, and analytics. Over time, it expanded support for Playwright and Cypress alongside Selenium and Appium, becoming a staple in many QA and DevOps toolchains.

It became popular because it removed the heavy lift of procuring, updating, and scaling device/browser infrastructure. Teams could run large parallel suites, accelerate feedback cycles, and gain insights without maintaining hardware. Its strengths include a well-established real device cloud, broad framework compatibility (Selenium/Appium/Playwright/Cypress), and enterprise-grade features. However, not every use case fits a general-purpose device cloud. Organizations may need deeper capabilities (for example, visual AI, model-based testing, or performance and security testing), tighter integration with specific ecosystems, or different cost and scalability profiles.

That is why many teams explore alternatives—some that compete head-to-head as device clouds, and others that complement or specialize in adjacent domains like visual testing, synthetics, RPA, performance, and security.

Overview: the top 40 alternatives to Sauce Labs

Here are the top 40 commercial alternatives to Sauce Labs covered in this guide:

• Applitools Eyes

• Applitools for Mobile

• Automation Anywhere

• BitBar

• BlazeMeter

• Blue Prism

• BrowserStack Automate

• Burp Suite (Enterprise)

• Checkly

• Cypress Cloud

• Datadog Synthetic Tests

• Eggplant Test

• Functionize

• Happo

• IBM Rational Functional Tester

• Kobiton

• LambdaTest

• LoadRunner

• Mabl

• Micro Focus Silk Test

• Microsoft Playwright Testing

• NeoLoad

• New Relic Synthetics

• Percy

• Perfecto

• Pingdom

• RPA Tools (UiPath)

• Ranorex

• ReadyAPI

• Repeato

• Sahi Pro

• Squish

• TestCafe Studio

• TestComplete

• Testim

• Tricentis Tosca

• UFT One (formerly QTP)

• Virtuoso

• Waldo

• testRigor

Why look for Sauce Labs alternatives?

• Cost and licensing at scale: Large device concurrency and extended test minutes can become costly, especially for organizations with many parallel pipelines or high usage across teams.

• Specialized needs beyond a device cloud: Visual AI, component-level visual regression, model-based testing, synthetic monitoring, or DAST often require tools built specifically for those jobs.

• Authoring experience preferences: Some teams want low-code, NLP-driven, or self-healing capabilities that reduce maintenance overhead compared to traditional scripted tests.

• Data residency, compliance, or security controls: Certain industries require strict data handling or on-premises/hybrid deployment models not aligned with a general device cloud.

• Tech stack alignment: Teams committed to specific frameworks or ecosystems (for example, Playwright-only, SAP-heavy environments, or Qt/embedded UIs) may get better fit and productivity from niche tools.

Detailed breakdown of alternatives

Below, each alternative includes a concise description, core strengths, and how it compares to Sauce Labs. The goal is to help you quickly determine fit based on your team’s needs.

Applitools Eyes

Applitools Eyes is a visual testing tool for web, mobile, and desktop with AI-powered visual diffs and the Ultrafast Grid, built by Applitools.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: While Sauce Labs provides device/browser infrastructure, Eyes focuses on visual correctness. Many teams pair the two, but if visual validation is your priority, Eyes complements or can replace parts of UI validation pipelines.

• Best for: Front-end teams and QA validating look-and-feel across versions.

Applitools for Mobile

Applitools for Mobile extends Applitools’ visual AI to iOS and Android, focusing on mobile-specific visual validations.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Sauce Labs provides the device cloud; Applitools for Mobile ensures the app’s visual fidelity. They are often used together; choose Applitools if visual correctness is the primary concern.

• Best for: Teams validating mobile UI look-and-feel across versions.

Automation Anywhere

Automation Anywhere is an RPA and desktop UI automation platform for Windows that overlaps with test automation needs.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Sauce Labs is a device/browser cloud, whereas Automation Anywhere targets RPA and desktop UI. Choose it when you need to automate business processes beyond browsers and mobile.

• Best for: Teams automating end-to-end flows across apps and platforms, especially desktop-heavy.

BitBar

BitBar by SmartBear is a cloud grid for mobile and web testing on real devices.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Both are device clouds. BitBar can be an alternative if you prefer SmartBear tooling or need specific device coverage and integrations.

• Best for: Teams requiring cloud-based real device and browser automation.

BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter is a performance and load testing platform for web, API, and protocols with SaaS runners and analytics.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: BlazeMeter doesn’t replace device clouds; it complements them for performance validation. Choose it when load and scalability testing are critical.

• Best for: Performance engineers and DevOps teams running stress/load tests.

Blue Prism

Blue Prism is an RPA/desktop automation platform for Windows that can drive repeatable UI workflows.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focuses on RPA and desktop processes rather than device/browser grids. Use it when business process automation is the core need.

• Best for: Teams automating end-to-end UI workflows across desktop applications.

BrowserStack Automate

BrowserStack Automate is a large device and browser cloud for web and mobile (real devices).

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Very similar category. Teams often compare coverage, performance, pricing, and enterprise features between the two.

• Best for: Teams needing a robust, managed device and browser cloud.

Burp Suite (Enterprise)

Burp Suite Enterprise is an automated dynamic application security testing (DAST) platform for web and API scanning.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focuses on security scanning, not device clouds. Use it to complement functional test suites with DAST coverage.

• Best for: Teams requiring automated web/API security scanning.

Checkly

Checkly provides headless checks and end-to-end testing for web and API, combining synthetics with browser checks as code (Playwright-based).

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Emphasizes browser checks and synthetics rather than a broad device cloud. Choose it for code-first synthetics with Playwright.

• Best for: Teams automating end-to-end and production checks with modern workflows.

Cypress Cloud

Cypress Cloud is a SaaS runner and insights platform for Cypress tests, offering parallelization, flake detection, and dashboards.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Sauce Labs supports many frameworks and mobile; Cypress Cloud optimizes Cypress-only pipelines. Pick it when you are all-in on Cypress.

• Best for: Teams centering their web testing on Cypress.

Datadog Synthetic Tests

Datadog Synthetic Tests offer browser and API checks for web and API with CI/CD integrations.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focuses on production monitoring and synthetics rather than a comprehensive device cloud. Choose it for observability-driven testing.

• Best for: Teams running synthetics tied to production monitoring.

Eggplant Test

Eggplant Test combines model-based testing with image recognition for desktop, web, and mobile.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Offers AI/CV-driven testing and model-based techniques rather than focusing on device cloud infrastructure. Ideal when model-based validation is key.

• Best for: Teams needing model-based/AI testing across platforms.

Functionize

Functionize is an AI-assisted end-to-end testing platform for web and mobile with ML-powered element selectors.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Emphasizes AI-driven authoring and maintenance, while Sauce Labs emphasizes device infrastructure. Choose it to reduce locator maintenance.

• Best for: Teams seeking AI-assisted test authoring across browsers and mobile.

Happo

Happo is a visual regression platform for web components, enabling snapshot diffs in CI.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Complementary—Happo focuses on component visuals, while Sauce Labs covers runtime device/browser execution. Choose Happo to shift-left visual checks in CI.

• Best for: Front-end teams validating component look-and-feel.

IBM Rational Functional Tester

IBM RFT is a legacy enterprise functional UI automation tool for desktop and web.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focuses on functional UI automation within enterprise environments rather than a cloud device grid. Choose it for legacy/enterprise GUI coverage.

• Best for: Teams automating UI in traditional enterprise stacks.

Kobiton

Kobiton is a mobile device cloud offering real device testing and automation via Appium.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Similar in category as a device cloud, with a strong mobile focus. Compare based on device availability, performance, and pricing.

• Best for: Teams emphasizing mobile device automation.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest is a cross-browser and mobile testing platform supporting Selenium, Appium, Playwright, and Cypress.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Directly competitive in cloud grid capabilities. Evaluate based on coverage, speed, and enterprise features.

• Best for: Teams needing a versatile, managed test grid.

LoadRunner

LoadRunner is an enterprise performance and load testing suite for web, API, and protocols.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Complements functional testing by focusing on performance at scale. Choose it for robust enterprise performance testing.

• Best for: Performance engineers and DevOps teams.

Mabl

Mabl is a low-code and AI-enhanced end-to-end testing platform for web and API with a strong SaaS-first experience.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Prioritizes low-code and AI-driven authoring over providing a broad device cloud. Choose Mabl to speed up authoring and maintenance.

• Best for: Teams automating web and API flows with minimal scripting.

Micro Focus Silk Test

Silk Test is an enterprise functional UI automation tool for desktop and web.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: More about local/enterprise UI automation than cloud device infrastructure. Choose it for legacy UI automation needs.

• Best for: Enterprise teams with complex desktop/web UIs.

Microsoft Playwright Testing

Microsoft Playwright Testing is a managed cloud service for running Playwright browser tests at scale.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: A great fit if your entire stack is Playwright-centric; Sauce Labs is broader across frameworks and mobile.

• Best for: Teams standardizing on Playwright for web testing.

NeoLoad

NeoLoad is an enterprise load and performance testing platform for web, API, and protocols.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Complements device cloud testing by focusing on performance. Choose it for end-to-end performance strategy.

• Best for: Performance engineering teams.

New Relic Synthetics

New Relic Synthetics offers scripted browser checks and API monitoring.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: A production synthetics tool rather than a full device grid. Choose it to monitor live systems.

• Best for: Teams monitoring production readiness and uptime.

Percy

Percy provides visual testing for the web, capturing visual snapshots with CI integration.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Complements device clouds by focusing on visual regression. Choose Percy to add visual guardrails to PRs.

• Best for: Front-end teams and QA verifying visual consistency.

Perfecto

Perfecto is an enterprise-grade cloud grid for mobile and web (real devices).

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Similar category. Evaluate based on device coverage, analytics, and enterprise needs.

• Best for: Teams requiring a mature enterprise device cloud.

Pingdom

Pingdom is a synthetics and uptime monitoring tool for web and API.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Not a replacement for a device cloud; best used to keep tabs on production reliability.

• Best for: Ops and DevOps teams monitoring production SLAs.

RPA Tools (UiPath)

UiPath is an RPA platform for Windows and macOS that can be used for regression UI automation.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: RPA-first rather than device-cloud-first. Choose UiPath when automating enterprise workflows across apps, including non-web.

• Best for: Teams automating end-to-end processes with RPA.

Ranorex

Ranorex is a codeless/scripted end-to-end testing tool for desktop, web, and mobile with a strong object repository and recorder.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focuses on authoring and execution across platforms, while Sauce Labs focuses on the cloud grid. Choose Ranorex for powerful desktop/web/mobile authoring in one tool.

• Best for: Teams seeking mixed codeless/scripted workflows.

ReadyAPI

ReadyAPI is a commercial API testing suite for SOAP/REST/GraphQL.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Complements UI automation by focusing on API quality. Choose it for robust API-first testing.

• Best for: Backend developers and QA validating APIs.

Repeato

Repeato is a codeless, computer-vision-based mobile UI testing tool for iOS and Android.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Repeato focuses on CV-driven mobile test creation, while Sauce Labs provides device infrastructure. Choose it for resilient, codeless mobile UI automation.

• Best for: Teams seeking visual-first mobile automation.

Sahi Pro

Sahi Pro is a web/desktop end-to-end UI automation tool built for robust enterprise web apps.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focuses on authoring and stability for enterprise UIs rather than a device cloud. Choose it for tricky enterprise web apps.

• Best for: Teams automating complex enterprise UI flows.

Squish

Squish is a GUI end-to-end test tool for Qt, QML, web, desktop, and embedded systems.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Specializes in Qt/embedded and desktop environments; Sauce Labs is focused on browser/mobile clouds. Choose Squish for Qt and embedded UI automation.

• Best for: Teams in Qt/embedded/desktop ecosystems.

TestCafe Studio

TestCafe Studio is the codeless IDE variant of TestCafe for web end-to-end testing.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Authoring-focused for web; Sauce Labs is device infrastructure. Choose it for teams preferring codeless web test creation.

• Best for: Teams seeking a codeless web E2E solution.

TestComplete

TestComplete by SmartBear is a codeless/scripted tool for desktop, web, and mobile with record/playback and multi-language scripting.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Authoring and execution tool across platforms vs. Sauce Labs’ cloud grid. Can be paired with a device cloud or used standalone with local infrastructure.

• Best for: Teams needing mixed codeless/scripted capabilities across platforms.

Testim

Testim (by SmartBear) is an AI-assisted end-to-end testing platform for web with self-healing locators.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Emphasizes AI-driven authoring; Sauce Labs emphasizes device coverage. Choose Testim to streamline authoring/maintenance for web.

• Best for: Teams seeking AI-assisted web test authoring.

Tricentis Tosca

Tricentis Tosca is a model-based test automation platform for web, mobile, desktop, and SAP.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Enterprise MBTA with deep SAP support vs. device cloud coverage. Choose Tosca for model-based enterprise testing at scale.

• Best for: Large enterprises and SAP-heavy environments.

UFT One (formerly QTP)

UFT One is an enterprise GUI automation tool for desktop and web by OpenText (formerly Micro Focus).

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focused on functional UI automation tooling rather than device cloud infrastructure. Choose UFT One for enterprise GUI automation continuity.

• Best for: Teams with long-standing enterprise UI automation.

Virtuoso

Virtuoso is an AI-assisted end-to-end testing platform for web and mobile, using vision and NLP-driven authoring.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Prioritizes AI/NLP authoring over infrastructure breadth. Choose Virtuoso to enable non-technical authoring and faster maintenance.

• Best for: Teams seeking NLP-driven test creation across web and mobile.

Waldo

Waldo is a no-code mobile UI testing platform for iOS and Android with a recorder and cloud runs.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Mobile-focused no-code authoring vs. broad device cloud. Choose Waldo for quick, no-code mobile test creation.

• Best for: Teams prioritizing rapid, codeless mobile testing.

testRigor

testRigor is a natural-language end-to-end testing platform for web and mobile where tests are written in plain English.

• Strengths:

• Watchouts:

• Compared to Sauce Labs: Focuses on NLP-driven authoring rather than device infrastructure. Choose testRigor to empower broader teams to author tests.

• Best for: Teams seeking accessible, plain-English test authoring.

Performance and security complements

While the tools above are already categorized, it is worth reinforcing how the performance and security tools fit alongside Sauce Labs:

• BlazeMeter, LoadRunner, and NeoLoad: Choose these for scalable performance and load testing of web/API/protocols as a complement to functional device cloud testing.

• Burp Suite (Enterprise): Use it for ongoing automated DAST scanning to find security issues in web and API services, integrated with CI.

Synthetics and observability complements

• Checkly, Datadog Synthetic Tests, New Relic Synthetics, and Pingdom: These tools provide production-grade monitoring of user journeys, APIs, and uptime. They complement pre-release testing by continuously validating critical flows in production.

Visual testing complements

• Applitools Eyes, Applitools for Mobile, Percy, and Happo: These focus on visual correctness—from component-level diffs to full-page visual baselines—and often integrate with test runners or device clouds to add visual confidence.

Things to consider before choosing a Sauce Labs alternative

• Project scope and coverage:

• Language and framework support:

• Authoring experience:

• Ease of setup and onboarding:

• Execution speed and parallelization:

• CI/CD and DevOps integration:

• Debugging and analytics:

• Stability and self-healing:

• Security, compliance, and data residency:

• Scalability and reliability:

• Cost and licensing:

Conclusion

Sauce Labs remains a widely used platform for cross-browser and cross-device testing, especially when you want a mature real device cloud with strong framework support and enterprise features. Still, modern QA strategies often combine multiple tools to achieve depth in specific areas: visual testing, model-based authoring, synthetics, performance, security, RPA, or ecosystem-specific coverage (such as Playwright-only or SAP-heavy environments).

Choose a Sauce Labs alternative—or a complement—based on the outcomes you need most:

• If you need the broadest device/browser cloud: consider BrowserStack Automate, LambdaTest, BitBar, Perfecto, or Kobiton.

• If visual correctness is the priority: explore Applitools Eyes/Applitools for Mobile, Percy, or Happo.

• If you want AI/low-code/NLP authoring to reduce maintenance: evaluate Mabl, Functionize, Testim, Virtuoso, or testRigor.

• If your focus is performance or security: look at BlazeMeter, LoadRunner, NeoLoad, or Burp Suite (Enterprise).

• If production reliability and observability matter: Checkly, Datadog Synthetic Tests, New Relic Synthetics, and Pingdom can continuously validate live systems.

• If desktop, SAP, Qt, or embedded are in scope: consider UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, Squish, Ranorex, or IBM RFT.

In many organizations, the best path is a pragmatic mix: a capable device/browser cloud where it matters most, plus specialized tools that give you visual confidence, performance insight, and production assurance. Align the toolchain to your applications, team skills, and compliance needs, and you will set up your QA practice for reliable, scalable delivery.