Top 48 Alternatives to Burp Suite (Enterprise) for Web/API Testing

Introduction and Context

Burp Suite began as a desktop toolkit used by penetration testers to assess the security of web applications. Developed by PortSwigger, it quickly became popular because it bundled a powerful intercepting proxy, request manipulation tools, repeatable attack modules, and a robust scanner into a single, cohesive package. Over time, Burp Suite expanded into distinct editions: Community and Professional for interactive, expert-driven testing, and Burp Suite Enterprise for automated dynamic application security testing (DAST) at scale.

Burp Suite (Enterprise) focuses on automating DAST across large portfolios of web apps and APIs. It provides scheduling, CI/CD integrations, team management, and reporting that help organizations continuously scan for common vulnerabilities as part of their software delivery pipeline. It is widely adopted in security programs for its scanning engine, strong brand trust, and mature ecosystem.

However, many teams conduct far more than DAST. As modern QA and DevOps practices evolved, organizations began looking for alternatives or complementary tools to cover performance, reliability, visual regressions, accessibility, device/browser coverage, and different testing styles (e.g., BDD or keyword-driven). Teams also weigh cost, integration needs, and skill sets when deciding whether to broaden beyond a dedicated DAST platform.

This guide explores top alternatives that teams often evaluate alongside or instead of Burp Suite (Enterprise) for comprehensive web and API testing.

Overview: Top 48 Alternatives for Burp Suite (Enterprise)

Here are the top 48 alternatives for web/API testing that teams consider:

• Artillery

• BackstopJS

• BlazeMeter

• BrowserStack Automate

• Capybara

• Cucumber

• Cypress Cloud

• Cypress Component Testing

• Datadog Synthetic Tests

• Eggplant Test

• FitNesse

• Gatling

• Gauge

• Geb

• JMeter

• Katalon Platform (Studio)

• LambdaTest

• Lighthouse CI

• LoadRunner

• Locust

• Microsoft Playwright Testing

• NeoLoad

• New Relic Synthetics

• Nightwatch.js

• OWASP ZAP

• Pa11y

• Percy

• Pingdom

• Playwright Component Testing

• Playwright Test

• QA Wolf

• Ranorex

• Robot Framework + SeleniumLibrary

• Sauce Labs

• Selene (Yashaka)

• Selenide

• Serenity BDD

• Squish

• Storybook Test Runner

• TestCafe

• TestCafe Studio

• TestComplete

• Testim

• Tricentis Tosca

• Watir

• axe-core / axe DevTools

• k6

• reg-suit

Why Look for Burp Suite (Enterprise) Alternatives?

• Broader testing scope required: Many teams need performance, reliability, visual, accessibility, or device coverage beyond DAST.

• Cost and licensing constraints: Enterprise DAST can be expensive for large portfolios or frequent scans.

• Skill set and workflow fit: Security-focused tooling may not align with QA, Dev, or SRE workflows.

• CI/CD and scale needs: Some teams prefer cloud-native runners or horizontally scalable options for high test volume.

• Coverage and depth trade-offs: DAST focuses on runtime behavior, while some use cases need functional tests, API contract checks, or component-level validation.

Detailed Breakdown of Alternatives

Artillery

What it is: An open-source plus commercial performance/load testing tool for web, APIs, and protocols (by the Artillery team).

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Focuses on performance under load, not DAST; complements security scanning with reliability insights.

BackstopJS

What it is: An open-source visual regression tool using headless Chrome to compare UI snapshots.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Visual quality checks vs. security scanning; ideal for catching look-and-feel regressions.

BlazeMeter

What it is: A commercial SaaS for performance/load testing compatible with JMeter, Gatling, and k6.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Performance at scale vs. DAST; integrates well for pre- and post-deploy load validation.

BrowserStack Automate

What it is: A commercial cloud for cross-browser UI automation on real devices and browsers.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Enables functional UI coverage across environments, not security scanning.

Capybara

What it is: An open-source Ruby library for end-to-end web UI automation, often paired with RSpec/Cucumber.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional E2E tests vs. DAST; good for teams invested in Ruby tooling.

Cucumber

What it is: An open-source BDD/acceptance framework using Gherkin across multiple languages.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Specifications and functional tests, not automated DAST; helpful for shared understanding.

Cypress Cloud

What it is: Commercial SaaS for Cypress test insights, parallelization, and flake detection.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Focuses on web UI test execution and insights, not security scanning.

Cypress Component Testing

What it is: A tool to run web framework components in a real browser for fast feedback.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Component-level quality vs. runtime security; reduces defects earlier in the stack.

Datadog Synthetic Tests

What it is: Commercial browser and API synthetic monitoring integrated with observability.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Production-focused uptime and flows, not DAST; complements with continuous monitoring.

Eggplant Test

What it is: A commercial model-based testing platform with computer vision for desktop, web, and mobile.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional and UX automation across channels vs. security scanning.

FitNesse

What it is: An open-source wiki-based acceptance testing framework with fixture support.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Acceptance/ATDD focus instead of security scans; aligns with business-facing specs.

Gatling

What it is: Open-source plus enterprise performance/load testing in Scala, with code-as-tests.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Stresses apps to expose performance issues; complements DAST.

Gauge

What it is: An open-source BDD-like E2E framework from ThoughtWorks.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional automation vs. security scanning; improves test readability.

Geb

What it is: An open-source Groovy/Spock-based DSL for web UI automation.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): E2E UI automation alternatives for JVM teams, not DAST.

JMeter

What it is: Apache open-source tool for performance/load testing across web, APIs, and protocols.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Performance measurement vs. vulnerability scanning; often used in CI.

Katalon Platform (Studio)

What it is: A commercial low-code platform for web, mobile, API, and desktop testing.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Broad functional coverage vs. DAST; can orchestrate diverse test types.

LambdaTest

What it is: A commercial cloud for cross-browser and mobile testing at scale.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Platform for functional/device coverage, not security scanning.

Lighthouse CI

What it is: An open-source tool for automated audits of performance, accessibility, and best practices.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Non-security quality audits; complements DAST with web vitals and a11y.

LoadRunner

What it is: A commercial enterprise performance/load testing suite (OpenText).

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Deep performance engineering vs. security scanning; suited for large systems.

Locust

What it is: An open-source Python-based load testing tool using user-behavior scripts.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Validates performance under load, not DAST; accessible for Python teams.

Microsoft Playwright Testing

What it is: A commercial managed cloud for running Playwright tests at scale.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional UI test execution, not security scanning.

NeoLoad

What it is: A commercial enterprise load/performance testing tool (now part of Tricentis).

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Performance and scalability insights vs. DAST.

New Relic Synthetics

What it is: Commercial scripted browser and API checks integrated with New Relic observability.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Monitoring and uptime focus; complements security with production checks.

Nightwatch.js

What it is: An open-source end-to-end testing framework using WebDriver.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional automation rather than security scanning.

OWASP ZAP

What it is: An open-source DAST tool from OWASP for web and APIs.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Similar DAST category; cost-effective alternative with strong community support.

Pa11y

What it is: An open-source CLI for automated web accessibility audits.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Accessibility validation vs. security scanning; essential for inclusive design.

Percy

What it is: A commercial visual testing platform for visual snapshots and regressions.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): UI visual quality guardrails, not security scanning.

Pingdom

What it is: A commercial synthetic monitoring tool for uptime and transactional flows.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Production monitoring vs. vulnerability detection; focused on reliability.

Playwright Component Testing

What it is: An open-source tool to test components across frameworks in a real browser.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Early-stage quality checks vs. runtime security scans.

Playwright Test

What it is: An open-source end-to-end test runner for web with traces and advanced reporters.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional and UI testing, not DAST.

QA Wolf

What it is: A commercial service plus OSS tooling delivering done-for-you E2E tests (Playwright-based).

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Outsourced functional automation vs. in-house DAST scanning.

Ranorex

What it is: A commercial codeless/scripted automation suite for desktop, web, and mobile.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional automation breadth vs. DAST depth.

Robot Framework + SeleniumLibrary

What it is: An open-source keyword-driven framework with a rich ecosystem for web automation.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional/acceptance testing vs. security scanning; approachable for non-developers.

Sauce Labs

What it is: A commercial cloud for cross-browser and mobile testing with real devices/emulators.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Execution platform for functional/device coverage, not DAST.

Selene (Yashaka)

What it is: An open-source Python wrapper for Selenium inspired by Selenide.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional UI automation in Python, not security scanning.

Selenide

What it is: An open-source Java library offering a fluent API over Selenium.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional UI automation for Java teams vs. DAST.

Serenity BDD

What it is: An open-source BDD/E2E framework with rich reporting and screenplay pattern.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Behavior-focused functional testing, not security scanning.

Squish

What it is: A commercial GUI automation suite for Qt, QML, embedded, desktop, and web.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Specialized GUI/embedded coverage vs. DAST.

Storybook Test Runner

What it is: An open-source runner to test Storybook stories using Playwright.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Component-level quality gates vs. runtime security scans.

TestCafe

What it is: An open-source plus commercial E2E web testing tool that runs without WebDriver.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional automation; no built-in DAST.

TestCafe Studio

What it is: A commercial codeless IDE for TestCafe with visual test authoring.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Speeds functional test authoring vs. automated security scanning.

TestComplete

What it is: A commercial codeless/scripted automation tool by SmartBear for desktop, web, and mobile.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Broad functional automation; complements security with UI validation.

Testim

What it is: A commercial AI-assisted web E2E tool (SmartBear) with self-healing locators.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional UI testing enhanced by AI, not DAST.

Tricentis Tosca

What it is: A commercial model-based test automation suite for web, mobile, desktop, and SAP.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Enterprise functional coverage vs. DAST; strong for complex landscapes.

Watir

What it is: An open-source Ruby framework for web UI automation (Web Application Testing in Ruby).

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Functional UI tests, not security scanning.

axe-core / axe DevTools

What it is: Deque’s accessibility engine (OSS and commercial tools) for automated a11y testing.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Accessibility focus vs. security; essential for inclusive, compliant apps.

k6

What it is: An open-source load testing tool (Grafana), with a managed cloud option.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Performance validation under load; complements DAST in pipelines.

reg-suit

What it is: An open-source CI-friendly visual regression diffing tool.

• Strengths:

Compared to Burp Suite (Enterprise): Visual regression checks vs. security scanning.

Things to Consider Before Choosing a Burp Suite (Enterprise) Alternative

• Scope and objectives: Do you need security scanning, functional testing, performance, accessibility, visual checks, or a combination?

• Language and tech stack fit: Prefer Java, JS/TS, Python, Ruby, or low-/no-code? Ensure first-class support.

• Ease of setup and maintenance: Balance power with simplicity; consider test authoring speed and stability.

• Execution speed and reliability: Look for parallelization, flake reduction, and deterministic runs.

• CI/CD integration: Native plugins, APIs, and containerized runners streamline automation at scale.

• Debugging and insights: Traces, video, logs, snapshots, and dashboards accelerate triage.

• Community and ecosystem: Active communities, plugins, and documentation reduce long-term risk.

• Scalability and cost: Evaluate licensing, cloud/on-prem options, and the ability to scale horizontally.

• Governance and compliance: Reporting, access controls, audit trails, and integration with issue trackers matter in regulated environments.

• Complementary coverage: Consider how a tool fills gaps in your testing strategy (e.g., performance + visual + accessibility alongside security).

Conclusion

Burp Suite (Enterprise) remains a widely used and respected DAST platform for automating web and API security scans across large portfolios. Its maturity, scanning engine, and CI/CD readiness make it a dependable choice for security programs.

At the same time, modern teams often need a broader toolkit. Performance platforms like k6, Gatling, and JMeter validate reliability under load. Visual tools such as Percy, BackstopJS, and reg-suit prevent UI regressions. Accessibility tooling like axe-core and Pa11y helps maintain compliance. Cross-browser clouds including BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, and LambdaTest provide realistic device coverage, while Playwright, Cypress, and their associated services offer fast, reliable test execution and debugging. OWASP ZAP stands out as a cost-effective open-source DAST alternative.

Choose alternatives based on your goals: use DAST when prioritizing runtime security; add performance tools to ensure scale; apply visual and accessibility checks to protect UX and inclusivity; and leverage cloud grids and modern runners to speed feedback in CI/CD. In many organizations, the best approach pairs a DAST platform with complementary tools to create complete, continuous web and API quality coverage.